TLT Explains
Pentagon Revokes Security Clearance of Former CIA Officer Susan Miller
What's happening
Pentagon Revokes Security Clearance of Former CIA Officer Susan Miller — The Federalist was awarded the 2025 Dao Grand Prize for Investigative Journalism on Wednesday for its extensive coverage of the Russia Collusion narrative. The honor was presented at the conclusion of a ceremony recognizing excellence in investigative reporting. Explainer DOJ Launches Investigation Into Russiagate Actions by Federal Officials Mollie Hemingway, editor-in-chief of The Federalist, and senior legal correspondent Margot Cleveland were instrumental in the publication's success, which included a series of exclusive reports that challenged prevailing narratives surrounding the Russia investigation. Among the notable pieces highlighted were investigations into the Department of Justice's financial dealings with individuals involved in the Russia hoax, as well as revelations about the suppression of evidence by the January 6 Committee. The Federalist's reporting also included claims that intelligence officials threatened whistleblowers who refused to endorse fabricated assessments. Hemingway stated, "Our team spent years digging through transcripts and documents to uncover the top-down corruption plaguing our intelligence agencies." This dedication to uncovering the truth has been a hallmark of The Federalist's approach to journalism, particularly in the context of national security. The publication faced significant challenges during its investigations, including censorship attempts from major tech platforms, which often labeled its findings as misinformation. Despite these obstacles, The Federalist remained committed to transparency and truth in its reporting. The Dao Prize, funded by the Dao Feng and Angela Foundation, aims to recognize outstanding investigative journalism. According to the Young America’s Foundation (YAF), the foundation was established to revive a spirit of curiosity and skepticism in American media. Chuck Grassley’s recent revelations about Operation Arctic Frost highlight the dangers of government weaponization, a concern that transcends party lines.
What's at stake
The tendency among some Republicans to label abuses within agencies like the FBI and CIA as 'Biden’s FBI' or 'Biden’s CIA' may obscure the broader issue of a powerful, permanent bureaucracy that operates independently of elected officials. This framing risks trivializing serious structural threats to constitutional governance. Explainer FBI Targeted Nine Republican Lawmakers in Investigation, Grassley Claims The misuse of government resources, as seen in Operation , is not merely a political controversy but a manifestation of a bureaucracy that has grown so powerful it acts as an unelected 'fourth branch of government.' This situation is exacerbated by a judiciary that some critics argue prioritizes ideology over constitutional fidelity, allowing agencies to infringe upon the rights of citizens without accountability. Labeling these agencies as 'Biden’s' implies that a change in administration would rectify the issues, a notion that is misleading. The reality is that the corruption and overreach of the bureaucracy did not begin with President Biden and will not necessarily end with a Republican administration. Evidence suggests that these agencies operate with a degree of autonomy that persists regardless of which party holds the presidency. During President Trump’s administration, the bureaucracy was accused of targeting him and his allies, as well as ordinary citizens, including parents concerned about educational issues. The infamous Operation Crossfire Hurricane was described as an 'insurance policy' against a . Declassified records indicate that then-Vice President Joe Biden suppressed concerns from Ukrainian officials regarding his family's business dealings in Ukraine.
The documents, released by CIA Director John Ratcliffe, suggest that U.S. intelligence officials did not disseminate an intelligence report that highlighted these concerns during Biden's visit to Kyiv in December 2015. Explainer New Documents Suggest Biden Intervened in Burisma Investigation Ukrainian officials reportedly expressed "bewilderment" ( ) and "disappointment" over Biden's visit on December 7-8, 2015, believing he focused on delivering a generic public speech rather than engaging in substantive discussions with Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko or other government officials. Hunter Biden reportedly earned over $80,000 per month despite lacking expertise in the energy sector. Critics have pointed to this arrangement as a potential conflict of interest, particularly in light of 's role in U.S. The report noted that Poroshenko's administration was aware of U.S. media scrutiny regarding Biden's family's alleged ties to corruption in Ukraine. The concerns raised by Ukrainian officials centered on Hunter Biden's position as a board member of Burisma, a Ukrainian energy company. What to watch next is whether new filings, agency actions, votes, or court decisions change the timeline—and how officials respond in the weeks ahead.
Why it matters
The coverage highlights: Pentagon Could Recall Democrat Senator For Court-Martial Over ‘Seditious’ Video. The coverage highlights: The Federalist Wins 2025 Dao Grand Prize for Investigative Journalism. The coverage highlights: Calling It 'Biden’s FBI' Diminishes The Real Threat. The coverage highlights: Comey’s Handwritten Notes Reveal Knowledge of Clinton Campaign's Role in Russia Narrative. The coverage highlights: House Committee Refers John Brennan To DOJ For Prosecution. The coverage highlights: Declassified Records Reveal Biden Suppressed Ukrainian Concerns About Family Business Dealings.
Key facts & context
2025-11-24: Pentagon Could Recall Democrat Senator For Court-Martial Over ‘Seditious’ Video. 2025-11-20: The Federalist Wins 2025 Dao Grand Prize for Investigative Journalism. 2025-11-13: Calling It 'Biden’s FBI' Diminishes The Real Threat. 2025-11-07: Comey’s Handwritten Notes Reveal Knowledge of Clinton Campaign's Role in Russia Narrative. 2025-10-21: House Committee Refers John Brennan To DOJ For Prosecution. 2025-10-07: Declassified Records Reveal Biden Suppressed Ukrainian Concerns About Family Business Dealings. 2025-08-14: Pentagon Revokes Security Clearance of Former CIA Officer Susan Miller.
Timeline & key developments
2025-11-24: Pentagon Could Recall Democrat Senator For Court-Martial Over ‘Seditious’ Video. 2025-11-20: The Federalist Wins 2025 Dao Grand Prize for Investigative Journalism. 2025-11-13: Calling It 'Biden’s FBI' Diminishes The Real Threat. 2025-11-07: Comey’s Handwritten Notes Reveal Knowledge of Clinton Campaign's Role in Russia Narrative. 2025-10-21: House Committee Refers John Brennan To DOJ For Prosecution. 2025-10-07: Declassified Records Reveal Biden Suppressed Ukrainian Concerns About Family Business Dealings. 2025-08-14: Pentagon Revokes Security Clearance of Former CIA Officer Susan Miller.
Primary sources
Further reading & references
- (Additional background links will appear here as we cover this topic.)