The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform has released a report asserting that many of President Joe Biden's executive actions signed with an autopen lack proper authorization, calling them "void." The report, titled "The Biden Autopen Presidency: Decline, Delusion, and Deception in the White House," highlights concerns over Biden's cognitive and physical abilities, suggesting that he was not fully in control of his administration.
Investigators found that 88.3% of documents signed by Biden, excluding public laws, were executed using an autopen. This method was first employed just five days into his presidency. Mike Howell, president of the Oversight Project, stated, "It was autopen by default in the administration," indicating that the autopen was used extensively even when Biden was physically present in Washington, D.C.
The report also noted that Biden's signature on hand-signed documents showed significant variation, suggesting a decline in his abilities over time. Howell emphasized the unprecedented scale of autopen use, stating, "The autopen was designed as a tool for executive convenience… not as a tool to basically replace the president. And that’s what happened in the Biden years."
The investigation revealed that Biden granted 4,245 acts of clemency during his term, significantly surpassing the records of previous presidents. This included a high number of commutations and pardons, raising questions about the legitimacy of these actions, particularly as they were allegedly executed with the autopen.
Rep. James Comer, R-Ky., chairman of the House Oversight Committee, has urged the Department of Justice (DOJ) to conduct a thorough review of all executive actions taken during Biden's presidency. Howell stated, "Investigating is no longer good enough. We need accountability," pressing for prosecutions related to the autopen's use and the actions taken under its authority.
The report has sparked debate over the implications of using an autopen in presidential duties, with critics arguing that it undermines the integrity of executive actions. Howell has called for accountability, stating, "Victory happens when accountability happens. The people who have the no-good pardons should be federally prosecuted."
The findings of the committee and the Oversight Project have drawn attention to the potential constitutional crisis posed by the extensive use of the autopen, raising questions about the transparency and legitimacy of Biden's presidency.
As the investigation continues, the focus remains on whether the DOJ will take action against those involved in the alleged misuse of the autopen and the executive powers it represents.
Why it matters
- Primary documents and sources are linked for verification.
- The report questions the legitimacy of Biden's executive actions, claiming many are void due to improper autopen use, raising constitutional concerns.
- Concerns over Biden's cognitive abilities are highlighted, suggesting he may not be fully in control of his administration.
- The extensive use of the autopen for signing documents raises questions about the integrity of presidential duties and actions taken during his term.
What’s next
- Rep. James Comer has urged the DOJ to review all executive actions taken by Biden during his presidency.
- Calls for accountability include potential prosecutions related to the autopen's use and the clemency actions executed under it.