TLT Explains
'Little Beasts' Exhibition Explores Intersection of Art, Science, And Theology
What's happening
'Little Beasts' Exhibition Explores Intersection of Art, Science, And Theology — The 80th anniversary of the Nuremberg Trials serves as a critical reminder of the horrors associated with unchecked human experimentation during World War II. This milestone highlights the atrocities that led to the establishment of the 1947 Nuremberg Code, a foundational document in medical ethics that emphasizes informed consent, minimal risk, and the prohibition of exploiting vulnerable human beings. The code prioritizes the safety of all human subjects over any perceived societal benefits. Explainer Amid Review Of Deadly Abortion Drug, FDA Greenlights Copycat However, a significant flaw in U.S. regulations warrants attention: the outdated definitions in 45 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 46, which governs the protection of human subjects in research funded or conducted by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Critics argue that it is time to align this decades-old law with current scientific understanding of human embryology. While 45 CFR 46 offers baseline protections and additional safeguards for vulnerable populations, it contains misleading definitions regarding fundamental terms related to human development. For instance, the regulation defines a "fetus" as the "product of conception from implantation until delivery" and "pregnancy" as the time from implantation until delivery. Notably, it fails to define the term "embryo," which is critical since the embryonic period is when all major organs and body systems begin to form. Experts in human embryology assert that the first stage of human development begins at fertilization, not implantation. James Watson, the co-discoverer of the DNA double helix, passed away earlier this month at the age of 97.
What's at stake
His groundbreaking work in molecular biology earned him a Nobel Prize in 1962 and made him a prominent figure in science. Watson's contributions to the understanding of DNA were monumental, and he authored the bestselling book 'Double Helix,' which chronicles the story behind his discovery. Explainer As A Former DC Cop, The Federal Takeover Was The Right Move Despite his significant achievements, Watson's legacy has been overshadowed by controversy. In 2007, he faced backlash after making comments regarding intelligence differences among races, specifically stating that social policies are based on the assumption that intelligence is equal across races. Although he apologized for his remarks, the fallout led to his resignation from various scientific positions and a retreat from the public eye. In the years following his comments, Watson's contributions to science have been increasingly questioned by some academics. Critics have attempted to recast him not only as a racist but also as a sexist who allegedly appropriated the work of Rosalind Franklin, a fellow scientist whose research contributed to the understanding of DNA. While Watson acknowledged Franklin's contributions, the narrative that he stole her ideas has gained traction in some circles. Franklin, who passed away in 1958, never accused Watson or Crick of stealing her work.
This explainer pulls together the key facts, timeline, and official documents linked below to help readers follow the story as it develops. As more reporting is published, this page will be updated with additional context, primary documents, and a clearer picture of how the facts fit together. As more reporting is published, this page will be updated with additional context, primary documents, and a clearer picture of how the facts fit together. As more reporting is published, this page will be updated with additional context, primary documents, and a clearer picture of how the facts fit together. As more reporting is published, this page will be updated with additional context, primary documents, and a clearer picture of how the facts fit together. As more reporting is published, this page will be updated with additional context, primary documents, and a clearer picture of how the facts fit together. As more reporting is published, this page will be updated with additional context, primary documents, and a clearer picture of how the facts fit together. As more reporting is published, this page will be updated with additional context, primary documents, and a clearer picture of how the facts fit together. This explainer pulls together the key facts, timeline, and official documents linked below to help readers follow the story as it develops. What to watch next is whether new filings, agency actions, votes, or court decisions change the timeline—and how officials respond in the weeks ahead.
Why it matters
The coverage highlights: 80 Years After Nuremberg Trials, Doctors Still Commit Atrocities. The coverage highlights: The Left Canceled One Of The Greatest Scientists Of 20th Century.
Key facts & context
2025-11-28: 80 Years After Nuremberg Trials, Doctors Still Commit Atrocities. 2025-11-19: The Left Canceled One Of The Greatest Scientists Of 20th Century.
Timeline & key developments
2025-11-28: 80 Years After Nuremberg Trials, Doctors Still Commit Atrocities. 2025-11-19: The Left Canceled One Of The Greatest Scientists Of 20th Century.