Sen. Schmitt Argues American Identity is More Than an Abstract Idea

At the recent NatCon conference in Washington, D.C., Missouri Senator Eric Schmitt emphasized that American identity extends beyond mere abstract principles of equality and rights, asserting that it is rooted in a distinct people with a shared history and future.

Explainer As A Former DC Cop, The Federal Takeover Was The Right Move

Schmitt stated, "For decades, the mainstream consensus on the Left and the Right alike seemed to be that America itself was just an ‘idea’ — a vehicle for global liberalism." He criticized the notion that America’s essence is encapsulated in the lines of the Statue of Liberty and the Declaration of Independence, suggesting that this view undermines the nation's historical and cultural foundations.

The senator argued that America’s principles are not just theoretical constructs but are deeply embedded in the lives of its people. He asserted, "They are living, breathing things — rooted in a people and embodied in a way of life. It’s only in that context that they become real."

Schmitt's remarks reflect a growing discourse among some conservatives who contend that America should be viewed as a nation defined by its cultural and religious heritage rather than a mere collection of liberal ideals. This perspective challenges the narrative that America is fundamentally a "nation of immigrants," a concept that gained traction in the 1980s.

Critics of Schmitt's position, including Democratic strategist Jon Favreau, argue that the founding documents of the United States clearly articulate the country as an idea. Favreau responded to Schmitt's speech on social media, stating, "Our ancestors were fighting for a proposition. They were fighting for an idea. They have told us that. They wrote it down."

In his speech, Schmitt referenced the Declaration of Independence, noting its emphasis on the unity of the American people. He highlighted that the Founders understood their mission as specific to the American populace, which he believes is essential for maintaining the nation’s values and governance.

John Jay, in Federalist No. 2, articulated a vision of America as a connected country comprised of a united people with shared ancestry, language, and religion. Schmitt echoed this sentiment, suggesting that the nation’s identity is shaped by collective memory, customs, and beliefs.

The senator's stance raises questions about contemporary immigration policies and their alignment with American identity. He posited that historical immigration policies were often influenced by national origin, suggesting that certain cultural backgrounds may be more compatible with American values than others.

Schmitt's views have sparked debate about the implications of immigration on national identity, with some conservatives advocating for a return to policies that prioritize cultural assimilation. Supporters argue that acknowledging the historical context of American identity is crucial for shaping future immigration strategies.

As discussions around American identity and immigration continue, Schmitt's speech marks a significant moment in the ongoing dialogue about what it means to be American in the 21st century. The conversation reflects broader societal tensions regarding heritage, identity, and the future of the nation.